Skip to content
PesaFit
PesaFit

Max Heart Rate '220 - age': Why It's a Myth and What to Use Instead

Published on

The 220-age formula works as a population average, but individual estimates often miss badly. Tanaka is more accurate—and a maximal test beats any formula.

The '220 − age' formula for calculating maximum heart rate is the most repeated and the least accurate. Its origin is almost anecdotal.

Where 220 − age came from

Sam Fox and William Haskell proposed it in 1970 based on a hand-drawn graph from 11 small studies. It was never a validated formula for clinical use, but it spread because of its simplicity. Robergs and Landwehr (2002) showed its standard error is ±12 bpm.

More accurate formulas

FormulaAuthorTypical error
220 − ageFox & Haskell 1970±12 bpm
208 − 0.7·ageTanaka 2001±7 bpm
208.609 − 0.716·ageInbar 1994±7 bpm
207 − 0.7·ageGellish 2007±7 bpm

For age 30, 220 − age gives 190 bpm; Tanaka gives 187 bpm. For age 50, 220 − age gives 170 bpm; Tanaka gives 173 bpm. Beyond age 35, Tanaka is clearly better.

Field test (the most accurate)

  1. Warm up 10-15 min.
  2. Find a moderate hill with 4-6 min of climbing.
  3. Climb at increasing pace; the last 60 s at absolute max.
  4. At the top: record peak HR for the last minute.
  5. Repeat on another day to confirm.
HRmax is highly individual. Two healthy 30-year-olds can have 180 and 205 bpm. Knowing your actual number is much better than assuming any formula.

About this guide

Last reviewed
. We review content at least once a year, and sooner if relevant literature comes out. Update policy.
How it is verified
We prioritize meta-analyses, systematic reviews and official positions (ISSN, ACSM, EFSA, WHO, Cochrane). Full methodology · topic: Running y zonas de entrenamiento.
Conflicts of interest
Some product links are affiliate links from Amazon España and earn us a small commission at no extra cost to you. How we fund the project.
Medical disclaimer
Educational content. Does not replace consultation with a healthcare professional. More detail.

Spotted an error in a formula or recommendation? Email us at jesus.narvaez.tames@hotmail.com. Corrections are published as an updated note on the guide.

Recibe las guías nuevas por email

Cada viernes te mandamos las 2 guías nuevas de la semana (martes y jueves) y una calculadora relacionada. Sin spam, baja en un clic.

Comments

Ask questions, share your experience or suggest improvements. You need a GitHub account to comment; threads are hosted on Giscus over GitHub Discussions and are public.